Comparison of Irrigation to Floss as an Adjunct to Toothbrushing: Effect on Bleeding, Gingivitis, and Supragingival Plaque
Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness of the Waterpik™ Water Flosser, when paired with either a power or manual toothbrush, compared with a manual toothbrush and floss, in reducing gingivitis, bleeding, and supragingival plaque biofilm.
Methodology
One hundred and five subjects participated in this four-week study.
-
Group 1: Waterpik Water Flosser plus manual toothbrush
-
Group 2: Waterpik Water Flosser plus power toothbrush
-
Group 3 (control): Manual toothbrush and dental floss
Participants brushed twice daily and used either the water flosser or floss once daily.
Plaque biofilm, bleeding, and gingivitis were assessed at two and four weeks.
Results
After four weeks, the addition of a Waterpik Water Flosser resulted in significantly better oral health outcomes than manual brushing and flossing, regardless of toothbrush type used. Using the Waterpik Water Flosser was up to 93% more effective at reducing bleeding and up to 52% more effective at reducing gingivitis compared with traditional dental floss.
Conclusion
The Waterpik Water Flosser is a significantly more effective alternative to traditional dental floss for reducing gingivitis and improving overall gum health.